Review the evidence behind each improvement task

Intrix now includes an evidence section in dashboard improvement task details and the comprehensive report’s improvement tasks chapter. Your team can review what supports a recommendation and what is missing before assigning the work.

Read the evidence behind the recommendation

Each task identifies the evidence needed for a conclusion, then shows which pieces are available. These can include a recent measured answer for the question, whether AI actually searched, a record of its search terms, evidence to assess whether your page entered the search candidates, and a site diagnosis record.

Keeping these details with the task gives colleagues a concrete basis for discussing the recommendation. You can see how far the diagnosis goes before planning an edit or briefing a writer.

Use three outcomes to choose the next step

“Recommended action” means the required evidence is present and the task has not started. “Continue monitoring” applies when evidence is present and the task is underway or complete. To review its effect, read the task’s questions alongside comparison questions.

“Insufficient evidence” means a required piece is missing. Intrix identifies what is absent instead of producing a conclusion from incomplete evidence. Your team can discuss the missing information before committing effort to a proposed fix.

Separate search candidates from citations

The section records whether your page entered the search candidates separately from whether it was cited as a source. Appearing in search and supporting an answer are different events. Reading them separately helps you understand the starting point for the task.

Bring the evidence into your work review

Share the evidence section when assigning a task or discussing progress. To diagnose gaps in AI answers and choose practical improvement priorities, talk to Intrix. Regular measurement then helps your team follow changes after the work.