Trace incorrect AI answers to the pages behind them

Intrix now connects an incorrect detail in an AI answer to its cited source, your official information, and the next action in one row. In the external assets view, your team can follow a wrong price, opening time, or address to the information that needs attention.

Follow the detail through its source

The row links the AI answer to the page cited as evidence, including the passage used from that page where available. It then places the official information and the proposed action alongside it. You can review the discrepancy without assembling the trail from separate screens.

This makes a correction discussion more concrete: which value is wrong, which page supports it, and what should the information say?

Check beyond your own website

Your official page may already contain the correct detail while an external page continues to carry an older one. In many cases, the page that needs correction is the external source spreading that value. Rewriting your own page would leave that source unchanged.

Following the cited evidence helps your team choose where to direct its effort. A citation identifies a source used in that answer; it does not mean every incorrect answer comes from the same place.

Turn the discrepancy into a focused task

Use the official value and cited passage to explain the requested correction. Keeping those pieces together gives colleagues a clear basis for reviewing the issue and deciding how to approach the external publisher.

Discuss the information behind your answers

If incorrect details keep appearing in answers about your company, talk to Intrix about diagnosis and improvement priorities. Later measurement can help you follow changes after the work.